Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Ohio App. 3d 57 - Knapp v. Gurish

44 Ohio App. 3d 57 - Knapp v. Gurish’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2013

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc. · Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa Hills · 20 Ohio App. 3d 132 - Clemets v. Heston · Cuffy v. City of New York · Jenkins v. Krieger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the duty to arrest a person for disorderly conduct while intoxicated is necessarily discretionary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must assess the condition of the intoxicated person and determine whether his condition poses a risk of harm to himself or others. This assessment requires an exercise of professional judgment that is essential to the proper implementation of [R.C. 2917.11(B)(2)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.