Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

44 Okla. 136

143 P 852

Conness v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1914

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1914-10-20

<p> Brror from District Court, Osage County; </p> <p>Action by Ed. Brown against W. S. Conness and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed · Decided 1914-10-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1963

3 state decisions

10191419201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

¶2 This action was commenced in the district court of Osage county upon eight promissory notes past due and alleged to be unpaid. The answer admitted the execution of the notes, but averred a failure of consideration therefor. At the close of the evidence the court directed the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff, which was done. The defendants excepted to the order denying a new trial, and perfected an appeal to this court by petition in error and case-made.

¶3 The record was filed with the clerk of this court on May 8, 1912, and the cause was regularly submitted October 16, 1914. The plaintiffs in error have not served and filed brief, as required to do by rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix) of this court, nor offered any excuse for not doing so. It has been held many times by this court that under this state of the record the appeal will be presumed to have been abandoned, and should be dismissed.

¶4 We, therefore, recommend that this appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶5 By the Court: It is so ordered.

/44/okla/136 · .json · Public domain