Farrow v. Nevin’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1947
2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Garnsey v. County Court · McAnish v. Grant · Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co. · Waldman v. Connell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A writ of review, under our statute, cannot be used as a substitute for an appeal, nor can a mere error of an inferior court, officer, or tribunal, either of fact or of law, in the exercise of a rightful jurisdiction, be reviewed or considered in such a proceeding. The writ will lie only when the inferior court or tribunal has exceeded its jurisdiction or exercised its functions illegally or contrary to the course of procedure applicable to the matter before it: Garnsey v. County Court, 33 Or. 201 ( 54 Pac. 539, 1089 ); McAnish v. Grant, 44 Or. 57 ( 74 Pac. 396 ).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bechtold v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.