Hurvitz v. Hurvitz’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2009
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thrift v. Thrift · Sammis v. Medbury · Warren v. Warren · Phillips v. Phillips · Wilford v. Wilford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The transfer of the papers to this court does not deprive [trial] court of its jurisdiction. If needed at any time the papers can be returned temporarily to the [trial] court upon application made to this court. All such matters in divorce as require adjudication pending the decision of the appellate proceedings, continue within the jurisdiction of the [trial] court and are to be heard and decided by that court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Piotti v. Piotti
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.