Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 SO2D 722 - Segari v. Uchello

Segari v. Uchello’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1990
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1990

5 state decisions

2019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davies v. Bierce · Lindley v. Dakin · Viso v. Gullo · Quimby v. Stebbins · Jones v. Dietrich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[1] We think the judge erred. The proposition of law upon which the ruling was based, however apparently emphatic, is not without well recognized exceptions, one of which is that the rule does not preclude the admission of a valid prior or contemporaneous agreement of a collateral nature, although it is related in a general sense to the written instrument in ■question, where it is independent of and not at variance with or contradictory to the express or implied provisions thereof, but instead has for its subject a matter which the parties might naturally deal with separately.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The test of admissibility in such cases is whether the evidence offered tends to alter, vary, or contradict the written contract, or only to prove an independent, collateral fact about which the written contract was silent. In the former case the testimony is inadmissible; in the latter it is competent and proper. “ * * *» ******”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.