44 So. 3d 1060 - Hamilton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Tollett v. Henderson · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State · Vielee v. State · Brooks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if it plainly appears from the face of the motion, any annexed exhibits and the prior proceedings in the case that the movant is not entitled to any relief.” Id. at 1063 (¶ 3) (quoting Miss.Code Ann. § 99-39-11(2) (Supp.2009)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]o be entitled to an evidentiary hearing, 'a [movant] must demonstrate, by affidavit or otherwise, that there are unresolved issues of fact that, if concluded favorably to the [movant], would warrant relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This may not be accomplished through [the movant's] own unsupported allegations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.