44 So. 3d 167 - Adderly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 803 So. 2d 598 - Connor v. State · Watson v. Louisiana · Straight v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tjhe appropriate test is twofold: (1) did the police employ an unnecessarily suggestive procedure in obtaining an out-of-court identification; (2) if so, considering all the circumstances, did the suggestive procedure give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. The factors to be considered in evaluating ,the likelihood of misidentification include [“]the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time, of the crime, the witness’s degree of attention, the accuracy of the witness’s prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation, and the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.[”]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.