Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 SW2D 967 - Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.

Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1993

11 state decisions

401932194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Dallas v. Atkins · Herring v. City of Mexia · Dillon v. Whitley · City of Ft. Worth v. Capps Land Co. · Beatty v. Panhandle Const. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have duly considered all the other complaints of the plaintiffs in error, which go to the validity of the assessment in question, and find no merit in any except the one which relates to the failure to apportion liability for the assessment that was levied in the lump sum of $7,810.22.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.