Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 SW3D 361 - Matthews v. Commonwealth

Matthews v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Burge · Abernathy v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Wirth · Speers v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.