Pitre v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Almanza v. State · National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · Behrens v. Pelletier · Cadillac Products, Inc. v. Trienda Corp. · Rousseau v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person acts intentionally, or with intent, with respect to the nature of his conduct [or] as to a result of his conduct when it is his conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result. A person acts knowingly, or with knowledge, with respect to a result of his conduct when he is aware that his conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.