Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 SW3D 690 - Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 263rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Brown v. Ohio · Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. · United States v. Mock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After having reviewed the arguments of counsel and reading the brief, so that you all know for any curiosity, as I am listening to you all as the trial progresses, I make notes as to what I need to hear to satisfy the State's case. The second item was—well, first, was money misappropriated? I was able to answer that yes. The second item is, so whose money, the City's or the contractor's? Bad as it pains me to do it, I have to grant the motions based on the law. Each defendant is acquitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.