Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 TENN 190 - Crawford v. State

Crawford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1867

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2006

10 state decisions

30186718701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"But, if, after the whole statement is given in evidence, the prosecutor can contradict any part of it, he is as liberty to do so; and then the whole testimony is left to the jury for their consideration, precisely as in other cases where one part of the evidence is contradictory to another; for, it is not to be supposed that all the parts of a confession are entitled to equal credit. "The jury may believe that part which charges the prisoner, and reject that which is in his favor, if they see sufficient grounds for doing so. If what he said in his own favor is not contradicted by evidence offered by the prosecutor, nor improbable in itself, it will naturally be believed by the jury, and they are not authorized arbitrarily to reject it; but still, they are not bound to give it weight on that account, but are at liberty to judge of it like other evidence, by all the circumstances of the case; 1 Greenleaf's Ev., Sec. 218."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “•“It is not'enough, in criminal cases involving the life and liberty of the accused, that the law of the- case be partially stated. The accused is entitled, in such cases, to such a charge as the facts of the case require, and ■ nothing short of that will satisfy the demands of justice.” ... •”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.