Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 U.S. 515 - Camden v. Doremus

Camden v. Doremus’s Empirical Analysis

44 U.S. 515 · 1845

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
August 1991
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1991 · most notably Bram v. United States (1897), District of Columbia v. Woodbury (1890)

24 federal appellate · 19 state decisions — followed in 13 states

1801845185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dulany v. Hodgkin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consider objections of this character as vague and nugatory, and, if entitled to weight anywhere, certainly as ■without weight before an appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.