The State of Maryland v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company’s Empirical Analysis
44 U.S. 534 · 1845
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terrett v. Taylor · Yeaton v. The United States · People v. Morris · Stewart v. Anderson · Certiorari to the Sessions of Montgomery County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the legislature] had unquestionably the power to change its policy, and allow the company to pursue a different course, and to release it from its obligations both as to the direction of the road and the payment of the money. For, in doing this, it was dealing altogether with matters of public concern, and interfered with no private right; for neither the commissioners, nor the county, nor any one of its citizens, had acquired any separate or private interests which could be maintained in a court of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.