Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Va. App. 19 - Medley v. Commonwealth

44 Va. App. 19 - Medley v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Boyd v. United States · Michigan v. Mosley · Davis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Through the exercise of his option to terminate questioning [a suspect] can control the time at which questioning occurs, the subjects discussed, and the duration of the interrogation. The requirement that law enforcement authorities must respect a person’s exercise of that option counteracts the coercive pressures of the custodial setting. We therefore conclude that the admissibility of statements obtained after the person in custody has decided to remain silent depends under Miranda on whether his “right to cut off questioning” was “scrupulously honored.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.