Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Va. App. 463 - Maye v. Commonwealth

44 Va. App. 463 - Maye v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Ornelas v. United States · 25 Va. App. 193 - McGee v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Hudson · 26 Va. App. 1 - Archer v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]robable cause, as the very name implies, deals with probabilities. These are not technical; they are factual and practical considerations in every day life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act. Probable cause exists where the totality of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit supports a common sense decision by the magistrate that there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. Probable cause is a fluid concept-turning' on the assessment of probabilities in particular factual contexts-not readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules. Because it is a fluid concept based on probabilities, the continued existence of probable cause at a particular time is dependent upon the circumstances. So long as probable cause continues to exist, the search will be valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.