¶1(dissenting) — It seems to me that the contract in suit clearly calls for the construction of a continuous line of road from at or near Wallula Junction to Walla Walla by *132way of the head of Eureka Elat, and that such contract is not complied with by the construction of a road from at or near Wallula Junction to Walla Walla, through Eureka Flat, with a branch or spur running to the head of the Flat. In other words, I think the main line should extend to the head of the Flat, and not a branch or spur from the main line. I therefore dissent.
44 Wash. 124
Hunt v. Upton
Decided October 13, 1906
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1906-10-13
, entered October 12, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits, in an action on a subscription agreement.
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1945
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1906-10-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →