Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Wash. 2d 312 - Gnash v. Saari

44 Wash. 2d 312 - Gnash v. Saari’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 1986

22 state decisions

1501954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Samson v. Beale · Gudmundson v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co. · Johnson v. Williams · Christiansen v. Parker · Gordon v. Brinton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the facts disclose that the real-estate agent had either express or implied authority from the seller to make the representations, the seller will be bound. For example, in the recent case of Jenness v. Moses Lake Development Co., 39 Wn. (2d) 151, 234 P. (2d) 865 , this court held that the sellers were bound by the false representations of their real-estate agent, Farrell, concerning the earnings of a tavern, despite the fact that there was no evidence that Farrell had any express authority to make the representations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Appellant contends that respondents, by operating the property as an apartment house in violation of the Seattle building code, made the title to the property un-merchantable. We disagree. The fact that there were some violations of the building code did not impair the title to the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.