Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Wash. 2d 833 - Brim v. Struthers

44 Wash. 2d 833 - Brim v. Struthers’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
September 1982
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1982

14 state decisions

501954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Earling v. Earling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because of the nature of the issue, whenever the custody of children is involved, the court may receive and consider competent and relevant evidence of the propriety of the parties as custodians, without any arbitrary time limitations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.