Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Wis. 2d 130 - State v. Knoblock

44 Wis. 2d 130 - State v. Knoblock’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 1999 · most notably 106 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Holmes (1982), 231 Wis. 2d 293 - County of Jefferson v. Renz (1999)

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

1801969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tumey v. State of Ohio · Henry v. State of Mississippi · State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. Burke · 33 Wis. 2d 80 - State v. Carter · 32 Wis. 2d 559 - Holloway v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Eligibility of judge to conduct trial. The judge who conducts the preliminary examination shall not conduct further proceedings unless the defendant and the district attorney consent on the record.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the probable cause needed to be shown to issue a criminal warrant is less than the probable cause needed to be shown to bind over a defendant for trial after a preliminary hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “each decision at the various stages of the proceedings is an independent determination with the varying burdens of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.