44 Wis. 2d 239 - Williams v. Rank & Son Buick, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 124 Wis. 2d 175 - Lundin v. Shimanski (1985), 164 Wis. 2d 306 - D'Huyvetter v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products (1991)
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 27 Wis. 2d 687 - City of Madison v. Geier · McCluskey v. Thranow · Jacobsen v. Whitely · Kaiser v. Nummerdor · 38 Wis. 2d 424 - Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not close his eyes to what is obviously discoverable by him.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“intelligence and experience of the misled individual”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) a false representation, (2) made with the intent to defraud and for the purpose of inducing another to act upon it, and (3) actually inducing another to rely and act upon that representation, causing injury or damage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jersild v. Aker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.