Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Bailey v. State (1987), Flamer v. State (1990)
2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Edwards v. Arizona · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · North Carolina v. Butler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The absence of a complete record of all pertinent exchange between a Trial Court and counsel is particularly distressing in a case of this magnitude and is not unlikely to constitute reversible error in a foreseeable situation. See State v. White, Del.Supr., 395 A.2d 1082, 1095 (1978).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Jensen v. State · Whalen v. State“to oversee a blow to a defendant’s right to a fair trial via the State’s sandbagging.” Id. at 1003 . 12 . Alston concedes that some limited testimony about the participant's role is permissible. He cites, for example, that it would have been permissible for the witness to say”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[C]ounsel ... should play the cards dealt him face up and in his rightful turn. He has no right to sneak an ace out of the discards and play it later.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.