Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 F.2d 1055 - Maple v. Commissioner

Maple v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
September 2004
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2004

7 federal appellate ·

1101971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilbur v. Commissioner · Thompson & Folger Co. v. Commissioner · Parsons v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Expenses of maintaining agricultural items in the preproductive state are deductible if they are sufficiently similar to the expenses that will be required to maintain them once they are productive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whether or not one is a farmer for tax purposes does not depend on his tilling the soil by his own labor rather than by that of hired hands, tenant farmers, or even professional nurserymen. Where, as here, the taxpayers assume the risk that the crop will never be harvested due to unforeseen circumstances and the crop is related to the taxpayers’ farming endeavors, the expenses they incur with regard to that crop are farming expenses. (Cf. Income Tax Reg. secs. 1.61-4(d), 1.182-2, 1.175-3.) Our taxpayers bore that risk and are just as entitled to the tax benefits afforded farmers as if they had raised the trees with their own hands. [ 440 F.2d at 1057 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If a dairy farmer buys his cows fully mature, he must capitalize their purchase price; if he buys them as calves, he may deduct the cost of raising them to maturity, even though that expense is as much a cost of obtaining an income-producing business as is the purchase of the mature cows.* * * * * * Expenses of maintaining agricultural items in the preproductive state are deductible if they are sufficiently similar to the expenses that will be required to maintain them once they are productive. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.