Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 F.2d 315 - Robert Harris v. Frank J. Pate, Warden

Robert Harris v. Frank J. Pate, Warden’s Empirical Analysis

440 F.2d 315 · 1971

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2004 · most notably United States v. Bailey (1980), Jones v. Blanas (2004)

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2101971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on J. Gordon Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner · Tilton v. Richardson · Powell v. Workmen's Compensation Board · James Pierce v. J. E. La Vallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York, Martin T. Sostre v. J. E. La Vallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York, William Sa Marion v. J. E. La Vallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York · Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “facts essential to justify his opposition,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.