Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

440 F.2d 409

Docket No. 29740.

Allied Mortgage & Development Co. v. Lee Acceptance Corp.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-04-15

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1971

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Allied Mortgage & Development Co v. Lee Acceptance Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama; Virgil Pittman, Judge.

Bert S. Nettles, Mobile, Ala., William McD. Kite, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Midland-Guardian of Pensacola.

Jack C. Gallalee, Herbert P. Feibelman, Jr., Ralph Holberg, III, Caffey, Gallalee & Edington, Mobile, Ala., for Allied Mortgage and Development Co.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

In this diversity action for breach of an agreement, we have carefully considered the points made on appeal. The District Court was faced with a difficult problem and it appears that its findings are not clearly erroneous and that its Order, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Fact and Law adequately resolved the contentions of the parties. Allied Mortgage and Development Company, Inc. v. Lee Acceptance Corporation et al., 324 F.Supp. 1073 (S.D.Ala.1971).

¶2

Affirmed.

/440/f2d/409 · .json · Public domain