Brown v. Snow’s Empirical Analysis
440 F.3d 1259 · 2006
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Baloch v. Kempthorne (2008), Shiver v. Chertoff (2008)
4 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Davis v. Town of Lake Park · Wideman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · Virgo v. Riviera Beach Associates, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“case law establishes that '[a] federal employee must pursue and exhaust her administrative remedies as a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing a Title VII action'...” Brown v. Snow, 440 F.3d 1259, 1263 (11th Cir.2006) (quoting Crawford v. Babbitt, 186 F.3d 1322, 1326 (11th Cir.1999)) (emphasis and ellipsis added). For federal employees, administrative exhaustion includes first”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review questions of subject matter jurisdiction de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.