Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 FSUPP 738 - In re the Duplan Corp.

In re the Duplan Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 1996
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 511 (§ 704 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)

Relies on Caesar v. Kiser · Barbre-Askew Finance, Inc. v. Thompson · Johnson v. Yates · Maxton Auto Co. v. Rudd · Reich v. . Triplett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person who improves any textile goods in the ordinary course of his business pursuant to an express or implied contract with the owner or legal possessor of such goods shall have a lien upon all goods of such owner or possessor in his possession for improvement. The amount of such lien shall be for the entire unpaid contracted charges owed such person for improvement of said goods including any amount owed for improvement of goods, the possession of which may have been relinquished....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.