Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 MD 33 - Kulbicki v. State

Kulbicki v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Frye v. United States · Northern Securities Company v. United States · Reed v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fell short of prevailing professional norms.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that bullets produced from different sources of lead would have a unique chemical composition,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “further research to explain the existence of overlapping compositions,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.