Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 Mich. 508 - People v. Wolfe

People v. Wolfe’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
3
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably People v. Carines (1999), People v. Cornell (2002)

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

4601992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen determining whether sufficient evidence has been presented to sustain a conviction, a court must view the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution and determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences arising from that evidence can constitute satisfactory proof of the elements of a crime.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person need not have actual physical possession of a controlled substance to be guilty of possessing it. Possession may be either actual or constructive. Likewise, possession may be found even when the defendant is not the owner of recovered narcotics. Moreover, possession may be joint, with more than one person actually or constructively possessing a controlled substance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.