People v. Dobben’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 18 U.S.C. § 4242
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not lightly presume that the Legislature intended a conflict, calling into question this Court's authority to control practice and procedure in the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDougall v. Schanz“evaluat[ing] and fil[ing] reports where civil commitment is sought subsequent to a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.