ANTINI v. ANTINI’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 9007 · 42 U.S.C. § 11607 · 42 U.S.C. § 3612 (§ 812 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on Blum v. Stenson · Buckhannon Board and Care Home Incs v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources · New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. Carey · Rodriguez v. Taylor · Cornella v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts should not read into a statute exceptions not made by the Legislature . It has been well said that 'seeking hidden meaning at variance with the language use is a perilous undertaking which is quite as apt to lead to an amendment of law by judicial construction as it is to arrive at the actual thought in the legislative mind.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. STITT V. DRUMMOND“Antini v. Antini , 2019 OK 20 440 P.3d 57 de novo review, this Court possesses plenary, independent, and non-deferential authority to examine the lower tribunal's legal rulings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The word 'shall' expresses a command or a mandatory directive creating an unequivocal right that leaves no discretion with the court to deny it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.