440 Pa. Super. 286 - Commonwealth v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Sullivan · Commonwealth v. Libonati · 312 Pa. Super. 435 - Commonwealth v. Chance · 400 Pa. Super. 79 - Commonwealth v. Hudgens · 268 Pa. Super. 225 - Commonwealth v. Ashford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has been observed that even a single verbal threat might be made in such terms or circumstances as to support the inference that the actor intended to terrorize or coerce. Moreover, it is unnecessary for the [speaker] to specifically articulate the crime of violence which he or she intends to commit where the type of crime may be inferred from the nature of the statement and the context and circumstances surrounding the utterance of the statement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re BR · In the Interest of B.R.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.