Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 So. 2d 115 - State v. Walters

440 So. 2d 115 - State v. Walters’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 939 So. 2d 574 - State v. Chandler (2006), 669 So. 2d 646 - State v. Flores (1996)

26 state decisions

1201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. O'Brien · Miller v. California · Freedman v. Maryland · Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc. · United States v. Batchelder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The crime of obscenity is the intentional: “(1) Exposure of the genitals, pubic hair, anus, vulva, or female breast nipples in any public place or place open to the public view with the intent of arousing sexual desire or which appeals to prurient interest or is patently offensive.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Obscenity under Section 106A(1) is not an inchoate offense, since it requires the act of "exposure." Thus, defendants' argument that there can be no attempt to commit this offense, because the completed offense is itself in the nature of an attempt, has no merit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “exposure ... with the intent of arousing sexual desire”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.