Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 So. 2d 197 - State v. Johnson

440 So. 2d 197 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2018

17 state decisions

801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hazelwood School District v. United States · 436 So. 2d 471 - State v. Sutton · 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar · 436 So. 2d 464 - State v. Chism

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Armed robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another from the person of another or that is in the immediate control of another, by use of force or intimidation, while armed with a dangerous weapon.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Anything of value’ must be given the broadest possible construction, including any conceivable thing of the slightest value, movable or immovable, corporeal of incorporeal, public or private, and including transportation, telephone and telegraph services, or any other service available for hire. It must be construed in the broad popular sense of the phrase, not necessarily as synonymous with the traditional legal term ‘property.’ In all cases involving shoplifting the term ‘value’ is the actual retail price of the property at the time of the offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A motion for a continuance shall be in writing and shall allege specifically the grounds upon which it is based and, when made by a defendant, must be verified by his affidavit or that of his counsel. It shall be filed at least seven days prior to the commencement of trial. "Upon written motion at any time and after contradictory hearing, the court may grant a continuance, but only upon a showing that such motion is in the interest of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.