Fredricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1986
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 414 So. 2d 509 - Williams v. State · 428 So. 2d 369 - N.U., Inc. v. T & R Seafood, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ex post facto application of the retention statute is not fundamental error and objection must be made at the trial level to preserve the issue for appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cofield v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.