Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 So. 2d 628 - Yesnes v. State

440 So. 2d 628 - Yesnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably 495 So. 2d 154 - Dufour v. State (1986), 761 So. 2d 269 - Robinson v. State (1999)

34 state decisions

1301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · McCord v. State · Baker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “however, suggests that the rule also allows, in the discretion of the court, withdrawal of the plea in the interest of justice, upon a lesser showing than good cause. In any event, this rule should be liberally construed in favor of the defendant. Adler v. State, 382 So.2d 1298, 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The law inclines toward a trial on the merits; and where it appears that the interests of justice would be served, the defendant should be permitted to withdraw his plea. Morton v. State, 317 So.2d 145, 146 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). A defendant should be permitted to withdraw a plea”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, commonsense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the "veracity" and "basis of knowledge" of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. And the duty of a reviewing court is simply to ensure that the magistrate had a "substantial basis for ... conclud[ing]" that probable cause existed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “His public defender then moved to withdraw as counsel on the ground that the defendant claimed his plea had been coerced. In Yesnes , the public defender was allowed to withdraw and new counsel appointed. However, the newly-appointed counsel was not prepared to argue at the hearing on the motion to withdraw plea. The Yesnes court observed that the defendant was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.