Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 So. 2d 845 - State v. Edwards

440 So. 2d 845 - State v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Kirby v. Illinois · Estelle v. Smith · Eisenstadt v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant in a probation revocation proceeding is not always entitled to counsel. His right to counsel exists only when due process requires that he be represented. Due process requires he be represented when the complexities of the issues involved in the revocation proceeding mandate assistance of counsel to assure fundamental fairness at the revocation hearing. When due process requires counsel the defendant must be advised of his right to counsel, and in the event he then requests an attorney, one must be appointed to represent him at the revocation hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Defendant's admissions made to his probation officer were properly admitted by the trial judge in spite of the absence of Miranda warnings; the Miranda rule has not been extended to probation hearings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.