Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 SW2D 121 - Jackson v. Gish

Jackson v. Gish’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coleman v. Zapp · Knox v. Long · Seaman v. Seaman · Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Company of Amarillo · Parrott v. Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is sometimes used in a general sense so as to include rendition of judgment'. 49 C.J.S. Judgments § 106, p. 229. Even the Supreme Court frequently uses the term `entered' as meaning `rendered' when the distinction is not significant. [footnote omitted] The use of the term `entered' in this sense by the bench and bar of this state has become so prevalent that it is a matter of common knowledge of which we take judicial notice. See also Smith v. Smith, 194 So.2d 917 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). Since the definition of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.