Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

440 S.W.2d 852

Sewell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1969-05-21

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1972

3 state decisions

Relies on Hill v. State · Sloan v. State · Dewitt v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-05-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

¶2The conviction is for the subsequent offense of driving while intoxicated; the punishment, two years in the Texas Department of Corrections.

¶3The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C. C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court “(w)ithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court” or during any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 412; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.

¶4Nothing appears in the record which should be considered under the provisions of Article 40.09, Section 13, supra.

¶5No question of indigency is raised.

¶6The judgment is affirmed.

/440/sw2d/852 · .json · Public domain