Leeper v. Asmus’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lynch v. Lynch · 225 Mo. App. 543 - Sylcox v. National Lead Co. · McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP · Schumacher v. Leslie · State Ex Rel. Badami v. Gaertner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n employee may sue a fellow employee only for affirmative negligent acts outside the scope of an employer's responsibility to provide a safe workplace.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[B]efore a court can determine whether a co-employee owes a duty in negligence at common law (a question of law), it must first be determined whether the workplace injury is attributable to the employer's breach of a nondelegable duty, a question of fact unique to the workplace.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McComb v. Norfus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.