Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 440 U.S. 332 - Quern v. Jordan

Quern v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

4,904
cited by 4,904 later decisions
58
cited 58 times by the Supreme Court
32
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

1,102 federal appellate · 853 district · 285 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4,904 later decisions (58 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman (1984), Kentucky v. Graham (1985)

1,102 federal appellate · 853 district · 285 state decisions — followed in 32 states

1.9k0197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Monroe v. Pape

Cited together with Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Hans v. State of Louisiana · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4,904 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a federal court, consistent with the Eleventh Amendment, may enjoin state officials to conform their future conduct to the requirements of federal law.”
    102 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The doctrine of law of the case comes into play only with respect to issues previously determined.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.