Stukenborg v. Teledyne, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
441 F.2d 1069 · 1971
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2006
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 271 · 35 U.S.C. § 282
Relies on Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. · Lincoln Engineering Co of Illinois v. Stewart-Warner Corporation · Mercoid Corporation v. Mid-Continent Inv Co · Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. · United States v. Univis Lens Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.