Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

441 F.2d 1169

Docket Nos. 20697, 20698.

Former Stockholders of Barr Rubber Products Company v. The McNeil Corporation and the Sun Corporation, Former Stockholders of Barr Rubber Products Company v. The B. F. Goodrich Company, the McNeil Corporation and the Sun Corporation

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • FORMER STOCKHOLDERS OF BARR RUBBER PRODUCTS COMPANYv.The McNEIL CORPORATION and The Sun Corporation
  • FORMER STOCKHOLDERS OF BARR RUBBER PRODUCTS COMPANYv.The B. F. GOODRICH COMPANY, The McNeil Corporation and The Sun Corporation

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

April 12, 1971.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-04-12

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1975

4 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on Former Stockholders of Barr Rubber Products Co. v. McNeil Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Albert L. Ely, Jr., Ely, Golrick & Flynn, Cleveland, Ohio, Flynn, Py & Druse, Sandusky, Ohio, of counsel, for appellants.

Phillip L. Kenner, Hamilton, Cook, Renner & Kenner, Richard E. Guster, Wise, Roetzel, Maxon, Kelly & Andress, Akron, Ohio, for McNeil Corporation.

Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, E. R. Hamilton, Akron, Ohio, for Sun Corporation.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, James C. Davis, Cleveland, Ohio, for B. F. Goodrich Co.

Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

¶1

This appeal was submitted to the Court on the briefs and record by stipulation of the parties. Upon consideration it is ordered that the judgments of the District Court be and they are hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Kalbfleisch, filed on March 20, 1970, 325 F.Supp. 917.

/441/f2d/1169 · .json · Public domain