Public-domain · open source

441 F.2d 658

Docket No. 26111.

Davis v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1971.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-05-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1971

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brady v. United States · Desist v. United States · Hinds v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1971-05-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Harry L. Davis, in pro. per.

¶2Richard Burke, U. S. Atty., Fred C. Mather, Morton Sitver, Asst. U. S. Attys., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.

¶3Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTED-LER, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5The order denying without a hearing the motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed. See Sims v. United States, 272 F.Supp. 577, affd. (4th Cir.) 382 F.2d 294, cert. denied 390 U.S. 961, 88 S.Ct. 1062, 19 L.Ed.2d 1158. Cf. Brady v. United States (1970) 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747. Cf. Hinds v. United States (9th Cir. 1970), 429 F.2d 1322.

¶6The defendant was carefully and fairly treated at the time he entered his guilty plea to one count of bank robbery.