United States v. Estrada’s Empirical Analysis
441 F.2d 873 · 1971
Citation profile
52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
June 1983
most recently cited
47 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Chimel v. California · United States v. Rabinowitz · Harris v. United States · Lutwak v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Even if there were sufficient evidence to prove that six defendants conspired together, appellant’s proposed instruction would demand a verdict of not guilty because the seventh defendant did not participate in the conspiracy, a wholly erroneous result. (See United States v. Kelly (2d Cir. 1965) 349 F.2d 720 , 757-758, cert. denied (1966) 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 .)” 441 F.2d at 878 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.