Trout Unlimited’s Empirical Analysis
441 F.3d 1214 · 2006
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2024
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Bender v. Clark · Boughton v. Cotter Corp. · Paluso v. Mathews · Cotton Petroleum Corporation v. United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the Forest Service’s decision on remand is not satisfactory, defendantintervenors can pursue administrative remedies and, if necessary, seek appellate review in the district and appellate courts at a later stage in the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because this court does not have jurisdiction over the issues raised in [the] motion to certify questions of state law, that motion is dismissed as moot.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.