Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 441 F.3d 1266 - In re Contempt Order

In re Contempt Order’s Empirical Analysis

441 F.3d 1266 · 2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell · Harris v. United States · United States v. Onu · United States v. Peterson · Rodriguez v. IBP, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is absolutely no indication that [the attorney’s] tardiness ... constituted “misbehavior” that obstructed the administration of justice ... particularly when [the attorney] was ready to proceed with the government’s detention position when requested by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`A lawyer's failure to attend court is not a contempt in the presence of the court.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “portend a threat to [the] court's immediate ability to conduct its proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.