Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 441 F.3d 254 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

441 F.3d 254 · 2006

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Foster (2007), United States v. Hassan (2014)

15 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

300200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Olano · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” U.S. Const, amend. V. When a defendant moves for a mistrial, the government may retry the defendant without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause unless the government’s conduct was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “so reckless as to be `the functional equivalent' of intent to cause a mistrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “exceeds the maximum guideline sentence authorized by the jury verdict alone.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.