Brunner v. Hampson’s Empirical Analysis
441 F.3d 457 · 2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Goldstein v. Christiansen · CompuServe, Inc. v. Patterson · In-Flight Devices Corp. v. Van Dusen Air, Inc. · Neogen Corporation v. Neo Gen Screening Inc · Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Tryg International Insurance Company Ltd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2)(a) A court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person who acts-directly or by an agent, as to a claim arising from the person’s: 1. Transacting any business in this Commonwealth; ■ 3. Causing tortious injury by an act or omission in this Commonwealth; 4. Causing tortious injury in this Commonwealth by an act or omission outside this Commonwealth if he regularly does or solicits business, or engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used'or consumed or services rendered in this Commonwealth, provided that the tortious injury occurring in this Commonwealth arises out of the doing or soliciting of business or a persistent course of conduct or derivation of substantial revenue within the Commonwealth;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.