Natasa Djedovic v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
July 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Mid-State Fertilizer Co. v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago · Capric v. Ashcroft · Niam v. Ashcroft · Mitev v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[There is nothing arbitrary about favoring [in-court] over remote testimony....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Casias“is a form of lie detector without the electrodes and graph paper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.